From bob.obara at kitware.com Tue Jul 11 10:46:00 2017 From: bob.obara at kitware.com (Bob Obara) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 10:46:00 -0400 Subject: [Cmb-users] Save vs Save As Message-ID: Hi All, I think the way we have defined Save vs Save As might have a couple issues. I?ve created a Wiki Page: https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmb/smtk/wikis/issues-with-smtk-save-and-save-as that describes the issue and possible ways to get around it. Please feel free to make changes and express opinions. Thanks! Bob Robert M. O'Bara, MEng. Assistant Director of Scientific Computing Kitware Inc. 28 Corporate Drive Suite 101 Clifton Park, NY 12065 Phone: (518) 881- 4931 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tj.corona at kitware.com Tue Jul 11 19:24:58 2017 From: tj.corona at kitware.com (TJ Corona) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 19:24:58 -0400 Subject: [Cmb-users] TalosIV is offline again Message-ID: <6A9C35ED-CD4E-44BC-A69B-5D4883B500C5@kitware.com> If anyone is still at the office, TalosIV is offline again. This means we will have to manually post ES packages again tomorrow. Thomas J. Corona, Ph.D. Kitware, Inc. Senior R&D Engineer 21 Corporate Drive Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662 Phone: 518-881-4443 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ben.boeckel at kitware.com Wed Jul 12 09:16:46 2017 From: ben.boeckel at kitware.com (Ben Boeckel) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 09:16:46 -0400 Subject: [Cmb-users] [Smtk-developers] TalosIV is offline again In-Reply-To: <6A9C35ED-CD4E-44BC-A69B-5D4883B500C5@kitware.com> References: <6A9C35ED-CD4E-44BC-A69B-5D4883B500C5@kitware.com> Message-ID: <20170712131646.GB17906@megas.kitware.com> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 19:24:58 -0400, TJ Corona wrote: > If anyone is still at the office, TalosIV is offline again. This means > we will have to manually post ES packages again tomorrow. It built packages. It being offline in buildbot is not related to it not being powered on. --Ben From haocheng.liu at kitware.com Thu Jul 20 12:42:07 2017 From: haocheng.liu at kitware.com (Haocheng Liu) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 12:42:07 -0400 Subject: [Cmb-users] Visualize aux_geom in Model Builder Message-ID: Hi all, Recently I tried a qt5 CMB superbuild. However, the auxiliary geometry is not rendered properly in the render view(screenshot attached). [image: Inline image 1] May I ask has anyone tried this? Thanks! -- Best regards Haocheng Haocheng LIU Kitware, Inc. R&D Engineer 21 Corporate Drive Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662 Phone: 518-881-4421 <(518)%20881-4421> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image.png Type: image/png Size: 47215 bytes Desc: not available URL: From david.thompson at kitware.com Thu Jul 20 13:02:36 2017 From: david.thompson at kitware.com (David Thompson) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 13:02:36 -0400 Subject: [Cmb-users] Visualize aux_geom in Model Builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Haocheng, > Recently I tried a qt5 CMB superbuild. However, the auxiliary geometry is not rendered properly in the render view(screenshot attached). > > May I ask has anyone tried this? Hmmm. The image-based tests were working for Bob yesterday (he called me about some other failures that appear to be due to the camera being reset after my auxiliary geometry changes and said that all but 5-6 tests were passing for him with Qt5). I will try to reproduce. David From david.thompson at kitware.com Thu Jul 20 13:22:08 2017 From: david.thompson at kitware.com (David Thompson) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 13:22:08 -0400 Subject: [Cmb-users] Visualize aux_geom in Model Builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <0C8F8CBE-1C72-4CD1-B06E-20E0F5820CF7@kitware.com> Hi Haocheng, > Recently I tried a qt5 CMB superbuild. However, the auxiliary geometry is not rendered properly in the render view(screenshot attached). > > May I ask has anyone tried this? I was not able to reproduce (macos sierra, qt5). David -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Screen Shot 2017-07-20 at 13.20.05.png Type: image/png Size: 242497 bytes Desc: not available URL: From haocheng.liu at kitware.com Thu Jul 20 13:22:21 2017 From: haocheng.liu at kitware.com (Haocheng Liu) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 13:22:21 -0400 Subject: [Cmb-users] Visualize aux_geom in Model Builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi David, On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 1:02 PM, David Thompson wrote: > Hi Haocheng, > > > Recently I tried a qt5 CMB superbuild. However, the auxiliary geometry > is not rendered properly in the render view(screenshot attached). > > > > May I ask has anyone tried this? > > Hmmm. The image-based tests were working for Bob yesterday (he called me > about some other failures that appear to be due to the camera being reset > after my auxiliary geometry changes and said that all but 5-6 tests were > passing for him with Qt5). I will try to reproduce. > Rebasing on master does not solve my problem. And I found another issue that toggling model's visiblity would not udpate entity lists' visibility properly.. (Try test2D.cmb and observe how eyeball switches). I would take a look on this one. > > David -- Best regards Haocheng Haocheng LIU Kitware, Inc. R&D Engineer 21 Corporate Drive Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662 Phone: 518-881-4421 <(518)%20881-4421> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From haocheng.liu at kitware.com Thu Jul 20 13:32:10 2017 From: haocheng.liu at kitware.com (Haocheng Liu) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 13:32:10 -0400 Subject: [Cmb-users] Visualize aux_geom in Model Builder In-Reply-To: <0C8F8CBE-1C72-4CD1-B06E-20E0F5820CF7@kitware.com> References: <0C8F8CBE-1C72-4CD1-B06E-20E0F5820CF7@kitware.com> Message-ID: Hi David, On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 1:22 PM, David Thompson wrote: > Hi Haocheng, > > Recently I tried a qt5 CMB superbuild. However, the auxiliary geometry is > not rendered properly in the render view(screenshot attached). > > May I ask has anyone tried this? > > > I was not able to reproduce (macos sierra, qt5). > > David > I just tried it on kerbin and moho (using today's CMB superbuild) and they all did not render the aux_geom properly. May be only Mac is immune from it? -- Best regards Haocheng Haocheng LIU Kitware, Inc. R&D Engineer 21 Corporate Drive Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662 Phone: 518-881-4421 <(518)%20881-4421> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Screen Shot 2017-07-20 at 13.20.05.png Type: image/png Size: 242497 bytes Desc: not available URL: From david.thompson at kitware.com Thu Jul 20 13:46:44 2017 From: david.thompson at kitware.com (David Thompson) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 13:46:44 -0400 Subject: [Cmb-users] Visualize aux_geom in Model Builder In-Reply-To: References: <0C8F8CBE-1C72-4CD1-B06E-20E0F5820CF7@kitware.com> Message-ID: >>> Recently I tried a qt5 CMB superbuild. However, the auxiliary geometry is not rendered properly in the render view(screenshot attached). >>> May I ask has anyone tried this? >> >> I was not able to reproduce (macos sierra, qt5). >> > I just tried it on kerbin and moho (using today's CMB superbuild) and they all did not render the aux_geom properly. May be only Mac is immune from it? 1. Have the superbuilds been converted to Qt5? 2. It doesn't look like there have been any uploads to https://data.kitware.com/#collection/58fa68228d777f16d01e03e5 since Monday, so I cannot verify that the packaged macos builds do/don't have this problem. David From haocheng.liu at kitware.com Thu Jul 20 13:48:52 2017 From: haocheng.liu at kitware.com (Haocheng Liu) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 13:48:52 -0400 Subject: [Cmb-users] Visualize aux_geom in Model Builder In-Reply-To: References: <0C8F8CBE-1C72-4CD1-B06E-20E0F5820CF7@kitware.com> Message-ID: On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 1:46 PM, David Thompson wrote: > >>> Recently I tried a qt5 CMB superbuild. However, the auxiliary geometry > is not rendered properly in the render view(screenshot attached). > >>> May I ask has anyone tried this? > >> > >> I was not able to reproduce (macos sierra, qt5). > >> > > I just tried it on kerbin and moho (using today's CMB superbuild) and > they all did not render the aux_geom properly. May be only Mac is immune > from it? > > 1. Have the superbuilds been converted to Qt5? > No, it's still qt4. > 2. It doesn't look like there have been any uploads to > https://data.kitware.com/#collection/58fa68228d777f16d01e03e5 since > Monday, so I cannot verify that the packaged macos builds do/don't have > this problem. > > David -- Best regards Haocheng Haocheng LIU Kitware, Inc. R&D Engineer 21 Corporate Drive Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662 Phone: 518-881-4421 <(518)%20881-4421> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From david.thompson at kitware.com Thu Jul 20 13:51:40 2017 From: david.thompson at kitware.com (David Thompson) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 13:51:40 -0400 Subject: [Cmb-users] Visualize aux_geom in Model Builder In-Reply-To: References: <0C8F8CBE-1C72-4CD1-B06E-20E0F5820CF7@kitware.com> Message-ID: <577DAA70-DA39-4408-84A0-7506C6DAE8CE@kitware.com> >> >>> Recently I tried a qt5 CMB superbuild. However, the auxiliary geometry is not rendered properly in the render view(screenshot attached). >> >>> May I ask has anyone tried this? >> >> >> >> I was not able to reproduce (macos sierra, qt5). >> >> >> > I just tried it on kerbin and moho (using today's CMB superbuild) and they all did not render the aux_geom properly. May be only Mac is immune from it? >> >> 1. Have the superbuilds been converted to Qt5? > No, it's still qt4. I'm confused; both qt4 and qt5 builds have this problem? How are the dashboard tests passing then? Are you sure it's not some spurious old plugins/libraries causing a problem? David From haocheng.liu at kitware.com Thu Jul 20 13:57:40 2017 From: haocheng.liu at kitware.com (Haocheng Liu) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 13:57:40 -0400 Subject: [Cmb-users] Visualize aux_geom in Model Builder In-Reply-To: <577DAA70-DA39-4408-84A0-7506C6DAE8CE@kitware.com> References: <0C8F8CBE-1C72-4CD1-B06E-20E0F5820CF7@kitware.com> <577DAA70-DA39-4408-84A0-7506C6DAE8CE@kitware.com> Message-ID: On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 1:51 PM, David Thompson wrote: > >> >>> Recently I tried a qt5 CMB superbuild. However, the auxiliary > geometry is not rendered properly in the render view(screenshot attached). > >> >>> May I ask has anyone tried this? > >> >> > >> >> I was not able to reproduce (macos sierra, qt5). > >> >> > >> > I just tried it on kerbin and moho (using today's CMB superbuild) and > they all did not render the aux_geom properly. May be only Mac is immune > from it? > >> > >> 1. Have the superbuilds been converted to Qt5? > > No, it's still qt4. > > I'm confused; both qt4 and qt5 builds have this problem? How are the > dashboard tests passing then? Are you sure it's not some spurious old > plugins/libraries causing a problem? > > I just checked with Ben, dashboard machines are still testing again qt4(qt5 has not been installed yet except for kerbin) . My local build is qt5. I don't know if it's caused by some spurious old plugins... I did do a clean qt5 superbuild. > David -- Best regards Haocheng Haocheng LIU Kitware, Inc. R&D Engineer 21 Corporate Drive Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662 Phone: 518-881-4421 <(518)%20881-4421> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From david.thompson at kitware.com Thu Jul 20 14:09:57 2017 From: david.thompson at kitware.com (David Thompson) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 14:09:57 -0400 Subject: [Cmb-users] Visualize aux_geom in Model Builder In-Reply-To: References: <0C8F8CBE-1C72-4CD1-B06E-20E0F5820CF7@kitware.com> <577DAA70-DA39-4408-84A0-7506C6DAE8CE@kitware.com> Message-ID: <084F5566-7355-4364-B284-3549A6254D18@kitware.com> >> I'm confused; both qt4 and qt5 builds have this problem? How are the dashboard tests passing then? Are you sure it's not some spurious old plugins/libraries causing a problem? >> > I just checked with Ben, dashboard machines are still testing again qt4(qt5 has not been installed yet except for kerbin) . > My local build is qt5. > > I don't know if it's caused by some spurious old plugins... I did do a clean qt5 superbuild. Well, it's suspicious that the dashboards show tests passing and yet their superbuilds do not work for you. I would check for old libraries and LD_LIBRARY_PATH settings on Linux. David From haocheng.liu at kitware.com Thu Jul 20 14:29:04 2017 From: haocheng.liu at kitware.com (Haocheng Liu) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 14:29:04 -0400 Subject: [Cmb-users] Visualize aux_geom in Model Builder In-Reply-To: <084F5566-7355-4364-B284-3549A6254D18@kitware.com> References: <0C8F8CBE-1C72-4CD1-B06E-20E0F5820CF7@kitware.com> <577DAA70-DA39-4408-84A0-7506C6DAE8CE@kitware.com> <084F5566-7355-4364-B284-3549A6254D18@kitware.com> Message-ID: On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 2:09 PM, David Thompson wrote: > > >> I'm confused; both qt4 and qt5 builds have this problem? How are the > dashboard tests passing then? Are you sure it's not some spurious old > plugins/libraries causing a problem? > >> > > I just checked with Ben, dashboard machines are still testing again > qt4(qt5 has not been installed yet except for kerbin) . > > My local build is qt5. > > > > I don't know if it's caused by some spurious old plugins... I did do a > clean qt5 superbuild. > > Well, it's suspicious that the dashboards show tests passing and yet their > superbuilds do not work for you. I would check for old libraries and > LD_LIBRARY_PATH settings on Linux. > > I found one interesting thing: *Dashboard aux_geoms tests* are trying to use add image operator to load CHesapeakeBay100x100.vti and NewRiver1M.dem. That's the reason why they are rendered properly and these tests pass. If I use add auxiliary geometry operator to load them then things would go south. SMTK 1.1.0 + CMB 4.2.0 are not affected. So my guess is that the _instance_entitie support breaks something in smtk that we never covered... David -- Best regards Haocheng Haocheng LIU Kitware, Inc. R&D Engineer 21 Corporate Drive Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662 Phone: 518-881-4421 <(518)%20881-4421> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From david.thompson at kitware.com Thu Jul 20 14:40:25 2017 From: david.thompson at kitware.com (David Thompson) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 14:40:25 -0400 Subject: [Cmb-users] Visualize aux_geom in Model Builder In-Reply-To: References: <0C8F8CBE-1C72-4CD1-B06E-20E0F5820CF7@kitware.com> <577DAA70-DA39-4408-84A0-7506C6DAE8CE@kitware.com> <084F5566-7355-4364-B284-3549A6254D18@kitware.com> Message-ID: <301837A6-6F7D-4D4C-9D42-4C21C4CF7009@kitware.com> Hi Haocheng, >> Well, it's suspicious that the dashboards show tests passing and yet their superbuilds do not work for you. I would check for old libraries and LD_LIBRARY_PATH settings on Linux. >> > I found one interesting thing: Dashboard aux_geoms tests are trying to use add image operator to load CHesapeakeBay100x100.vti and NewRiver1M.dem. That's the reason why they are rendered properly and these tests pass. > If I use add auxiliary geometry operator to load them then things would go south. As well they should; we have a separate operator for image data. It specifically requests that the entities it creates have their own separate representation, which is required for texture mapping to work. > So my guess is that the _instance_entitie support breaks something in smtk that we never covered... When I talked to Bob while implementing the instance support, he agreed that polydata and other non-image geometry should *not* have a separate PV representation by default. That is also required for instance support to work. We need a way for users to be able to load auxiliary geometry to be instanced and that is what "Add Auxiliary Geometry" is for. If you are loading image data, then you should use "Add Image". David