From bob.obara at kitware.com Wed Dec 9 11:29:30 2015 From: bob.obara at kitware.com (Kitware) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 11:29:30 -0500 Subject: [Cmb-users] Any Issues running MAC OS 10.11 Message-ID: <0B5257E0-0E5E-4C50-B20F-E853A19E5E17@kitware.com> HI Folks, I?m thinking of upgrading one of my macs to 10.11 - are there any problems building/running CMB/SMTK on that version? Bob Robert M. O'Bara, MEng. Assistant Director of Scientific Computing Kitware Inc. 28 Corporate Drive Suite 101 Clifton Park, NY 12065 Phone: (518) 881- 4931 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From robert.maynard at kitware.com Wed Dec 9 11:40:05 2015 From: robert.maynard at kitware.com (Robert Maynard) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 11:40:05 -0500 Subject: [Cmb-users] Any Issues running MAC OS 10.11 In-Reply-To: <0B5257E0-0E5E-4C50-B20F-E853A19E5E17@kitware.com> References: <0B5257E0-0E5E-4C50-B20F-E853A19E5E17@kitware.com> Message-ID: I haven't had any issues so far, although I haven't updated to the latest XCode ( using XCode 7.1.1). On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Kitware wrote: > HI Folks, > > I?m thinking of upgrading one of my macs to 10.11 - are there any problems > building/running CMB/SMTK on that version? > > Bob > > Robert M. O'Bara, MEng. > Assistant Director of Scientific Computing > > Kitware Inc. > 28 Corporate Drive > Suite 101 > Clifton Park, NY 12065 > > Phone: (518) 881- 4931 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Cmb-users mailing list > Cmb-users at computationalmodelbuilder.org > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmb-users > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bob.obara at kitware.com Wed Dec 9 16:06:19 2015 From: bob.obara at kitware.com (Kitware) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 16:06:19 -0500 Subject: [Cmb-users] CMB vs ParaView SuperBuilds Message-ID: Here are the differences between the two: Only in ParaView bzip2 numpy matplotlib vrpn vortexfinder2 mili_plugin mxml adios tbb Different Versions CMB ParaView netcdf 4.3.0 4.3.2 Other Stuff: ParaView QT on Windows is 4.8.4 not 4.8.6 Python have different URLs and MD5s CMB does build ftgl - (from https://github.com/ulrichard/ftgl.git) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ben.boeckel at kitware.com Wed Dec 9 16:13:14 2015 From: ben.boeckel at kitware.com (Ben Boeckel) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 16:13:14 -0500 Subject: [Cmb-users] CMB vs ParaView SuperBuilds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20151209211314.GA23106@megas.khq.kitware.com> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 16:06:19 -0500, Kitware wrote: > bzip2 Hmm, I think CMB should probably include this, but low priority. > numpy > matplotlib IIRC, these were not necessary in CMB. > vortexfinder2 ParaView plugin. > vrpn > mili_plugin > mxml > adios CMB probably doesn't care? > tbb Probably of some use to CMB. > Different Versions > CMB ParaView > netcdf 4.3.0 4.3.2 This doesn't even start to describe the differences between these two tarballs :/ . Using ParaView's is the way to go. > Other Stuff: > ParaView QT on Windows is 4.8.4 not 4.8.6 Some Qt4 bug on Windows reported by KEU(?). I haven't seen the bug though (well, with as much as I run Windows, maybe that's not surprising). > Python have different URLs and MD5s I think Python is different between the two (bzip2 shell scripts removed from the CMB one?). The tarball name should be fixed to be more descriptive (they're 2.7.3 with numpy, bzip2, zlib, freetype, and matplotlib included). > CMB does build ftgl - (from https://github.com/ulrichard/ftgl.git) For cgm -> oce -> ftgl depchain. --Ben